News Lawyer

News and Law and News + Law

Cyber Vigilantes, Bullies, and Virtual Shunning

Fascinating article about virtual mobs and internet vigilante justice.

Lori Drew, a mother, goes online and creates a fake MySpace account, pretending to be a teenage boy. She does this specifically to befriend Megan Meier (her daughter’s friend and daughter of a neighbor) in order to get information about her own daughter. Somewhere along the line, Drew turns on young Ms. Meier and berates her. Ms. Meier – tragically fragile – then commits suicide. The dead girl’s father finds out about his bullying neighbor’s apparent role in his daughter’s death, and in a spasm of righteous rage, destroys the Drew’s foosball table. The Drews then press police charges against the grief-stricken father. Internet vigilante Sarah Wells finds out, does some research, and organizes a virtual mob whose fury has real world consequences – enough so that police have increased their patrols around the Drews’ residence.

The facts here seem pretty egregious, but the key word is “seem.” Mobs are not particularly known to be careful fact-finders nor dispassionate dispensers of justice. Are we entering an age of virtual witch trials and online cultural justice when the real world fails to mete out subjectively appropriate punishment? And with the anonymity of the internet, do mobs have even less of a sense of fair play?

Aside from the obvious internet cultural issues stand some fascinating legal issues. There is a tort law concept known as the “eggshell skull,” where those committing torts are responsible for all consequences flowing from the injurious acts, even if the victim suffers from unusually high damages from the acts. Did Drew have reason to know how emotionally fragile Ms. Meier was? Was the bullying pervasive and outrageous? It would seem that Papa Meier could have a cause of action against Drew, but what about free speech?

And check out the end of the article – in an ironic twist, Sarah Wells is tabbed a “vigilante” by a counter-vigilante, who posts personal information of Wells on the internet. Great read.

November 22, 2007 - Posted by Tim Peterson | Cyberstalking, Privacy | , , , , | 6 Comments

6 Comments »

  1. Hi, Tim…interesting piece.

    Your question: “Are we entering an age of virtual witch trials and online cultural justice when the real world fails to mete out subjectively appropriate punishment?”. Perhaps, but my guess is no. I’ve been fascinated by this outpouring of empathy and support for Megan Meier and her parents as well as the swift retribution that denizens of the net have meted out to the Drews. I see it as a perfect storm most likely not repeated anytime soon. Consider:

    1) A child targeted for harassment and ultimately driven to suicide by an adult. Adult freely admits a primary role in setting up and perpetrating an online scam (in a police report), but covers up their involvement and the involvement of their family for weeks until they’re found out.

    2) Said adult remains defiant and even goes on the offensive against the parents of the deceased. The adult never apologizes or shows remorse, in fact, makes excuses and absolves themselves of any blame whatsoever. Blames the victim.

    3) Law enforcement encourages silence for one year after the incident provoking accusations of a cover up

    4) The media, when they do learn of the incident, refuse to name the perpetrator of the online hoax

    5) A random blogger picks up the story and outs the perpetrator

    6) Mass rage ensues

    These are a freak set of circumstances that we’re not likely to ever see again.

    Comment by Vigilante Vic | November 24, 2007 | Reply

  2. What an amazing and twisted story.

    The concept of a “group of vigilantes” is very interesting. How different is it from the original concept of a moot court–which reflects community standards in sentencing and punishment? It’s a very Libertarian form of justice, no?

    Comment by Alex | November 28, 2007 | Reply

  3. One important point: the vandalism against the Drews apparently all occurred before the case was ever in the press or the Internet, check the police reports on The Smoking Gun. Sarah Wells (my wife) did not “organize” a mob; she only posted Lori Drew’s common name in a post on her “fluff” blog, and suddenly the world has discovered her as a “cyber-vigilante”. I told her that the least she could have got out of this is a cool costume and a side-kick. A Bat-Cave would be O.K., too. Anybody could have figured out the identity of the Drew woman after reading the first press article. The police report that my wife was read by a contact in the town in MO confirmed the facts and the identity,, and The Smoking Gun had already ordered a copy and would have published it within a day or so.

    Comment by Michael Wells | November 29, 2007 | Reply

  4. [...] Current Laws Be Applied? Numerous legal theories have been advanced by bloggers such as by Tim Peterson’s News Lawyer, which suggests the application of a tort law concept known as the “eggshell [...]

    Pingback by Megan Meier: Law, Journalism, Tragedy and Irony | UsefulArts.us | December 5, 2007 | Reply

  5. Hi Tim,

    Interesting story. I first read about this story (USA Today) in July 07. I teach Interpersonal Communication at Wilson College in Chambersburg, PA. I’m incorporating the Megan Meirer story into my lecture on April 22.

    Would you mind if I used your question, “Are we entering an age of virtual witch trials and online cultural justice when the real word fails to mete out subjectively appropriate punishment?”

    Best,
    Felicia L. Shearer

    Comment by Felicia L. Shearer | April 20, 2008 | Reply

  6. this is world wide…check this out………………..http://www.HumanFleshSearchEngine.com

    Comment by 56md | June 27, 2008 | Reply


Leave a comment